The Correlation among Reading Motivation, Reading Anxiety, and Reading Comprehension of Tenth-Grade Students in Palembang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v7i2.4419Keywords:
Correlation, Reading Motivation, Reading Anxiety, Reading ComprehensionAbstract
This study examined the correlation among reading motivation, reading anxiety, and reading comprehension of tenth-grade students in Palembang. A quantitative correlational research design was employed, involving 509 students from SMA Bina Warga 1 Palembang and SMA Negeri 15 Palembang. Using cluster random sampling, 107 students were selected as the sample. Data were collected through a reading comprehension test and two questionnaires measuring reading motivation and reading anxiety. The findings indicated no significant correlation between reading motivation and reading comprehension (r = 0.087, p = 0.375), indicating that motivation to read did not influence students’ understanding of texts. Likewise, no notable correlation was identified between reading anxiety and reading comprehension (r = -0.022, p = 0.824), suggesting that anxiety was not a determining factor. These results revealed that reading motivation and reading anxiety did not have a substantial effect on reading comprehension. This suggests that psychological factors such as motivation and anxiety alone may not serve a decisive role in shaping reading comprehension. Instead, other factors such as teaching methods, students’ backgrounds, individual skills, and the learning environment may contribute to reading comprehension outcomes. The study offers insights for English teachers in designing reading instruction that considers multiple influencing factors. It may also guide future researchers in exploring additional variables affecting reading comprehension.
Downloads
References
Alghonaim, A. S. (2020). Impact of related activities on reading comprehension of EFL students. English Language Teaching, 13(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p15
Alhamdu. (2016). Interest and reading motivation. Psikis: Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.19109/psikis.v1i1.552
Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2015.3.3.002
Barber, A. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2020). How reading motivation and engagement enable reading achievement. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219893385
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Dalimunthe, H. A., Dewi, I. K., Yunita, Y., Faadhil, F., & Lubis, D. M. G. S. (2024). Building a supportive learning environment: The role of psychology in increasing student motivation and engagement. OPSearch: American Journal of Open Research, 3(4), 934–939. https://doi.org/10.58811/opsearch.v3i4.107
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864739
Fauzi, I., Saman, T. N., Zannah, N., Octaviani, S., & Winey, B. G. (2022). The relationship between students’ reading motivation and the success to comprehend English texts. Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues, 5(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v5i1.14959
Firdaus, N. (2022). Reading motivation and reading comprehension ability of the students at Islamic University of Malang. Joey: Journal of English Ibrahimy, 1(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.35316/joey.2022.v1i2.67-72
Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). How can students improve their reading comprehension skill? Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i2.9201
Guo, L. (2018). Modeling the relationship of metacognitive knowledge, L1 reading ability, L2 language proficiency and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 30(02), 209–231.
Habibian, M., Roslan, S., Idris, K., & Othman, J. (2015). The role of psychological factors in the process of reading. Journal of Education and Practice, 16(29), 114–123.
Hafiza, M., Syafitri, W., Eliza, E., & Putri, H. P. (2024). The correlation between students reading anxiety and their reading comprehension at the eighth grade of SMPN 3 Bukittinggi. Continuous Education: Journal of Science and Research, 5(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.51178/ce.v5i1.1802
Kartika, Y., Ilma, R., & Sari, R. K. (2023). Reading anxiety and reading comprehension in senior high school students. Didascein: Journal of English Education, 4(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.52333/djoee.v4i2.203
Kim, Y. S. G., & Piper, B. (2019). Cross-language transfer of reading skills: an empirical investigation of bidirectionality and the influence of instructional environments. In Reading and Writing (Vol. 32, Issue 4). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9889-7
Kirchner, E., & Mostert, M. L. (2017). Aspects of the reading motivation and reading activity of Namibian primary school readers. Cogent Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1411036
Komiyama, R. (2013). Factors underlying second language reading motivation of adult EAP students. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 149–169.
Kothari, C. R., & Garg, G. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International Publishers.
Krismayani, N. W., & Menggo, S. (2022). Think-aloud protocol analysis: Revealing the student’s problem in reading comprehension. Veles: Voices of English Language Education Society, 6(2), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i2.5782
Muhlis, A. (2017). Foreign language reading anxiety among Indonesian EFL senior high school students. English Franca: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 1(1), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v1i1.160
Mustikasari, M. (2021). Psychological barriers in reading comprehension encountered by the students at fourth semester of English education study program of University of Muhammadiyah Kotabumi academic year 2019/2020. Griya Cendikia, 6(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.47637/griya-cendikia.v6i2.103
Radiyah, R., Astrid, A., & Husnaini, H. (2023). The correlation between students’ reading motivation and reading comprehension at eighth grade students level. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(1), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i1.4320
Rama, A. N. (2021). The correlation between EFL anxiety and students’ reading comprehension. Prosodi: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(2), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.21107/prosodi.v15i2.12179
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
Tyas, K. A. T. (2024). The relationship between reading motivation and reading comprehension at vocational high school. Journal of English Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.62734/jetling.v4i1.257
Wigfield, A., & Gladstone, J. R. (2019). What does expectancy-value theory have to say about motivation and achievement in times of change and uncertainty? In Motivation in Education at a Time of Global Change (Vol. 20, pp. 15–32). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-742320190000020002
Wijayati, P. H., Mardianti, N., & Murtadho, N. (2021). The correlation between students’ reading anxiety and their reading comprehension in ESP context. International Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i2.15440
Zoghi, M. (2012). An instrument for EFL reading anxiety: Inventory construction and preliminary validation. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(1), 31–56.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alra Sabrina, Annisa Astrid, Deta Desvitasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
